MDEX's unique dual mining model splits transaction fees between buying Huobi Token (HT) and burning MDX. This calculator estimates potential returns from MDX staking and fee recycling.
66% of daily fees used to buy HT
34% of daily fees used for MDX burns
MDEX is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that uses an automated market maker (AMM) model and runs on multiple blockchains - Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Huobi Eco Chain (HECO) and Ethereum (ETH). Launched in January2021, the platform was born inside the Huobi ecosystem and later added BSC support in March2021. Its promise is to give traders low‑fee swaps across chains while rewarding liquidity providers through a unique dual‑mining scheme.
The platform’s standout feature is the dual mining system that splits daily transaction fees 66% toward buying Huobi Token (HT) and burning MDX, with the remaining 34% used for liquidity‑mining rewards. In practice, every swap generates fee revenue; a large chunk is automatically used to repurchase HT, which is then sent to a burn address, while a smaller slice fuels MDX token rewards for stakers.
Cross‑chain swaps happen via the MDEX Bridge a smart‑contract bridge that locks assets on the source chain and mints wrapped equivalents on the destination chain. This lets a user move a token from HECO to BSC without leaving the DEX interface, theoretically reducing the need for separate wallets or third‑party bridges.
The native utility token is MDX used for fee rebates, staking rewards and governance voting within the MDEX DAO. Token supply is fixed at 1billion, and the protocol’s repurchase‑and‑burn policy is designed to create a deflationary pressure over time. Despite an all‑time high of roughly $10 in February2021, the token price slumped to under $0.01 by late2025, a decline of more than 99%.
Staking MDX grants voting rights in the DAO decentralized autonomous organization that decides on fee structures, token burns and future feature rollouts. However, the tiny market cap and low liquidity mean that governance proposals have limited real‑world impact.
The DEX can be accessed through any web3‑enabled browser wallet. The most common choices are MetaMask a browser extension that injects an Ethereum‑compatible provider, allowing users to sign transactions on ETH, BSC and HECO, TokenPocket, Huobi Wallet, Math Wallet, ONTO and Bitkeep. After connecting, the UI shows three tabs - Swap, Liquidity and Earn - mirroring the layout of PancakeSwap.
Swaps are typically fee‑free on BSC and HECO, while Ethereum swaps inherit the usual gas costs. The platform advertises near‑zero slippage for low‑volume trades, but the thin order book (average daily volume under $12k) can cause price impact on larger orders.
Security is a mixed picture. The smart‑contract code is open‑source on GitHub, but activity has dwindled since 2022, with few recent commits or audits. More troubling are community‑driven alerts: multiple posts on ScamBitcoin (2025) label both mdex.com and mdex.co as phishing sites that mimic the official interface to steal funds. The official domain is mdex.com, but the similarity of the URLs has caused user confusion.
Regulatory risk also looms. Decentralized exchanges face intensified scrutiny under the EU’s MiCA framework and U.S. SEC guidance. MDEX does not publish a compliance statement, leaving traders to assume the platform operates in a legal gray area.
Feature | MDEX | Uniswap (ETH) | PancakeSwap (BSC) | Sushiswap (Multi‑chain) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Supported Chains | HECO, BSC, ETH | Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum | Binance Smart Chain | Ethereum, BSC, Polygon |
Daily Volume (2025) | ≈ $12k | ≈ $3.2bn | ≈ $2.1bn | ≈ $1.4bn |
Fee Model | 0% on BSC/HECO, fee‑split to HT & MDX burn | 0.3% + 0.05% protocol fee | 0.2% + 0.02% protocol fee | 0.3% + 0.05% protocol fee |
Liquidity Incentives | Dual mining (HT purchase + MDX burn) | UNI staking, liquidity mining pools | CAKE farming, Syrup pools | SUSHI staking, farms |
Community Size | Low - < 5k followers on Twitter | High - > 1M followers | High - > 800k followers | Medium - ≈ 200k followers |
In short, MDEX offers a unique fee‑recycling mechanism but falls short on liquidity, user base and recent development activity. For traders needing deep order books or fast execution, Uniswap and PancakeSwap remain the safer bets.
Because of the low volume, many users treat MDEX as a niche bridge rather than a primary trading venue.
Analysts are split. Some price‑prediction sites forecast a modest rebound for MDX in 2025 (around $0.07), while more bullish models predict a surge if the platform can revive its community and launch new DeFi products. However, the dominant narrative in 2025 is caution: without fresh development, higher TVL and clear anti‑phishing measures, MDEX is likely to remain a peripheral player.
Safety is mixed. The smart contracts are open‑source, but recent audit reports are missing and phishing warnings about the domain name are widespread. If you decide to use MDEX, double‑check the URL, use a hardware wallet, and only trade small amounts.
Every swap generates a fee. Approximately 66% of that fee is used to buy Huobi Token (HT) which is then burned, while the remaining 34% funds liquidity‑mining rewards and MDX token burns. This creates a self‑reinforcing loop that aims to increase token scarcity.
Yes. The MDEX Bridge locks the asset on the source chain and mints a wrapped version on the destination chain, enabling cross‑chain swaps without leaving the DEX interface.
MetaMask, TokenPocket, Huobi Wallet, Math Wallet, ONTO and Bitkeep are the most commonly listed options. Any wallet that can connect to BSC, HECO or Ethereum via Web3 will work.
Uniswap charges a flat 0.3% swap fee plus a 0.05% protocol fee. MDEX advertises zero fees on BSC and HECO, but the fee that does exist is redistributed to HT purchases and MDX burns, which can be attractive for token holders but does not reduce slippage caused by low liquidity.
Rama Julianto
March 23, 2025 AT 04:55Look, MDEX’s dual‑mining is a total joke if the daily volume is only $12k – nobody’s gonna make real profit.
Ben Parker
March 24, 2025 AT 01:29Yo, you’re all missing the bigger picture 🤔 – MDEX might actually be a hidden gem for cross‑chain arbitrage, especially if you jump on the bridge before the next gas surge 🚀. Grab some BNB, test a tiny swap, and you’ll see the fee‑recycling in action.
Philip Smart
March 24, 2025 AT 22:02Honestly, it’s just another copy‑cat DEX with zero liquidity – you’re better off staying on Uniswap.
Jacob Moore
March 25, 2025 AT 18:35If you’re new to DEXes, MDEX can still be a learning tool. Its UI mirrors PancakeSwap, so you’ll feel at home swapping BNB or HT. The zero‑fee swaps on BSC are nice for tiny trades, and the bridge lets you experiment with cross‑chain moves. Just keep your expectations low because the order books are shallow. Start with a small amount, watch the price impact, and you’ll get a feel for how the dual‑mining rewards work.
Annie McCullough
March 26, 2025 AT 15:09While the UI mimics PancakeSwap the underlying liquidity metrics are sub‑par the TVL is negligible and the fee‑recycling model is merely a tokenomics gimmick ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Carol Fisher
March 27, 2025 AT 11:42People should stop supporting shady platforms like MDEX – it’s a breeding ground for scams and you’re basically funding crypto‑fraud 🙅♀️🛑.
Melanie Birt
March 28, 2025 AT 08:15Hold up, let’s be factual – the smart contracts are open source and the dual‑mining mechanism does have merit, but the security concerns are real 😬. Always double‑check the domain mdex.com and use a hardware wallet. The low volume is the main issue, not the code itself.
Lady Celeste
March 29, 2025 AT 04:49MDEX is a dead‑end.
mark noopa
March 30, 2025 AT 01:22In the ever‑shifting landscape of decentralized finance, every new protocol invites us to ponder the nature of value.
MDEX, with its dual‑mining construct, attempts to weave scarcity and utility together like a philosophical tapestry.
Yet the thread is frayed when daily trading volume dwindles to a paltry $12 k, suggesting that market participants have largely abandoned the loom.
One could argue that the token burn mechanism is an elegant feedback loop, a self‑correcting algorithm that whispers promises of future price appreciation.
However, whispers remain just that when liquidity dries up, because even the most poetic burn cannot conjure depth where there is none.
The bridge technology, while technically sound, becomes a mere sidewalk if no one walks across it, leading to under‑utilized cross‑chain potential.
Moreover, the shadow of phishing domains looms like an existential threat, reminding us that trust is the ultimate substrate of any blockchain venture.
Security audits, or the lack thereof, pose a moral dilemma: should we embrace an open‑source contract that has not been polished by recent peer review?
Regulatory winds, especially from the EU’s MiCA and the U.S. SEC, further stir the philosophical waters, questioning whether decentralized exchanges can truly exist outside the jurisdictional net.
From a user’s perspective, the experience mirrors a minimalist art piece – clean UI, few features, and a stark emptiness that provokes both awe and discomfort.
If you are a risk‑averse trader, the prudent path may be to sidestep MDEX and gravitate toward platforms with robust TVL and active development.
Conversely, a daredevil explorer might find value in the low‑fee swaps on BSC, using the platform as a sandbox for experimental arbitrage.
The dual‑mining rewards, while modest, can still add a layer of passive income if one stakes MDX and holds HT, turning tiny fees into a micro‑interest stream.
In the grand scheme, MDEX serves as a case study of how innovative tokenomics can falter without community momentum and solid liquidity foundations.
So, dear reader, evaluate the platform with both eyes open, balance optimism with caution, and remember that in crypto, philosophy often meets hard‑core market reality 😅.
Helen Fitzgerald
March 30, 2025 AT 21:55Great breakdown! If anyone’s curious, start with a tiny test swap and keep the community vibe positive.
Hanna Regehr
March 31, 2025 AT 18:29For those pondering the safety of MDEX, remember that using a hardware wallet and confirming the SSL certificate goes a long way. The platform’s open‑source contracts can be inspected on GitHub, and while recent commits are sparse, the code itself hasn’t shown critical vulnerabilities. Still, keep your exposure low until the volume picks up again.
Orlando Lucas
April 1, 2025 AT 15:02It’s fascinating how the dual‑mining mirrors economic cycles – fees get recycled, creating a subtle deflationary pressure. Optimistically, if the community rallies, we could see a revitalization of liquidity. Until then, treat MDEX as an experimental playground.
Ethan Chambers
April 2, 2025 AT 11:35While the masses cling to Uniswap’s glamour, the true connoisseurs know that MDEX’s under‑the‑radar status offers pure, unadulterated DeFi art – if you can stomach the thin order books.
Daron Stenvold
April 3, 2025 AT 08:09Dear community, please approach MDEX with both curiosity and caution. The platform’s architecture is sound, yet the scarcity of liquidity renders large trades vulnerable to slippage. I urge you to conduct small‑scale trials, monitor the fee‑recycling impact, and share your findings for the benefit of all.
hrishchika Kumar
April 4, 2025 AT 04:42From a cultural lens, MDEX embodies the spirit of cross‑border experimentation, weaving together BSC, HECO, and Ethereum like a vibrant tapestry of digital commerce. Though the threads are thin, the potential for unity is bright.
Nina Hall
April 5, 2025 AT 01:15Let’s keep the conversation upbeat – even if MDEX is small now, collaborative liquidity pools could boost its destiny!
Anjali Govind
April 5, 2025 AT 21:49I dug into the recent transaction logs and noticed that most swaps are under $100, which explains the low volume. If we aggregate small trades, the fee‑recycling might become noticeable.
Sanjay Lago
April 6, 2025 AT 18:22Hey folks, just a heads‑up – always verify you’re on mdex.com, not the look‑alike sites. A tiny mistake can cost you big time.
arnab nath
April 7, 2025 AT 14:55They’re hiding a secret backdoor in the bridge contract.